Because Christianity is bigger than Biblical manhood or Biblical womanhood (Blog of Retha Faurie)

A complementarian asked me recently:

Just out of curiosity, do you think there is any significance in the fact that God is called a Father, or that Jesus was a man, or that his disciples were men? Or are these just incidental, the reflections of an outdated patriarchical (sic) culture? It’s a little off-topic from our present convo but it might be relevant or at least worth considering. I’ve known people who have a really hard time using the word “Father” to describe God or thinking of God as having any sort of gender. I think those people have sadly been influenced by radical feminist ideology…


The implication, of course, is that by not agreeing with him on a certain topic related to gender issues (we were talking about gender accuracy/ neutrality in Bible translations), I do not understand the significance of God’s alleged maleness.

Perhaps the best way to answer is with a counter-question:

Do you find it significant that God describe himself as carrying in God’s womb, giving birth and most likely nursing at his breast, but never as doing anything biologically male, or having male body parts?

(For evidence of the allegations above, the Bible speaks of God as (a) a woman in labour (Isa. 42:14); (b) a mother who births Israel (Isa. 46:3-4).; (c) a mother who gave birth to the Israelites (Dt. 32:18); and (d) El Shaddai may refer to the Hebrew word for breasts (“shadiam”). In this case, it would imply that God nourishes, supplies and satisfies.)

Nursing mother – is this an image of God the father?

Nursing mother – is this an image of God the father?

My answer is that I find both these points significant. and mention both when teaching about God.

Pictures convey more of a message than words. We remember much more of what we see than what we hear. And where “God the Father” is a word that is never explained by images whereby the person biologically needs to be male, the same cannot be said about the female pictures of God:

Several pictures have God with a womb and giving birth. The Bible may also use a name for God that implies Him suckling. (El Shaddai) These are things that literally can only be done by a woman. Clearly, God intended us to sometimes think of him in unmistakably and unalterably female terms.

What does all this mean? I will speculate in future posts. The important thing, though, is that we should not stare ourselves so blind on the “Father” word that we forget the biologically female pictures, or vice versa. We cannot ask only one of these two questions, nor pretend that only one of them have significance.

We have to study the significance of both, preferably simultaneously so our picture does not get skewed.


Comments on: "How significant is the fatherhood of God? (Part 1)" (4)

  1. I wonder if it has ever occurred to the person you were responding to that he may have been influenced by radically patriarchalist ideology that somehow mixed into modern Christianity. The Church Fathers (who absolutely were no feminists!) insisted that God has no gender. God having no gender is actually the orthodox position, calling him “Father” notwithstanding.


  2. Kindly tell me if two examples of the influence of modern, radical patriarchal ideology are : Fathered by God written by J.Eldredge and The Measure of a Man by G.Getz. I believe that my son and my husband have bought into modern patriarchy. They have read the books, followed the men, subscribe to their theology, attend men’s groups. I am a living witness that this modern day radical patriarchy is alive and well, leaving wives, mothers and sister in a difficult position. Praying for the Jesus, the Holy Spirit, the almighty God who I know to rain down divine revelation on present day authors of patriarchy.


    • Selah, I will ask my facebook CBE (Christians for Biblical equality)group about those books, and get back to you. If you are interested, they are here:

      Do you want to tell more of your experience with patriarchy?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hi, Selah. I am sorry that I never came back to you. They did not know the books, but J. Eldredge is influenced by a gender view that limits women. His more famous books are “captivating”, which he co-write with his wife, and “wild at heart”. Both are men-are-like-this-women-are-like-that books that does not give the full truth of how God calls people, whether male or female, to serve him.
      “Captivating”, especially, have drawn criticism from several sources.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: